Tag: relationships

  • On depth.

    “it’s not that deep” has become common phrase among the younger generations (millennials and gen z).  I wonder if it’s not that deep is perhaps a collective response to

    “you’re being dramatic”
    “you’re over-reacting”
    “you’re too sensitive”

    You may have heard this from a parent, a teacher, a colleague, or even a close friend. I believe these types of responses are not necessarily reflective of the individual receiving them. Instead, they reveal the unresolved discomfort of the person using the response. In psychology, specifically under the umbrella of psychodynamics, we refer to this as ‘projection.’  

    Thinking about how It’s not that deep came to be, I think it was born from the pain of not being heard and is thus another defence structure. We are perpetuating what others have done to us. In one generation it is ‘you’re being dramatic’ and in our generation, we say ‘it’s not that deep.’ Both phrases do the same thing: dismiss and shut down. Let me explain.

    On a micro-level, it’s not that deep prevents meaningful exploration for the individual who might just be trying to UNDERSTAND and FEEL their experience. It hinders development in thinking, feeling, exploring new ideas, questioning and understanding. This in turn, impacts how two people might engage with one another. So, if it halts self-understanding, it is almost inevitable that it will then hinder ‘together understanding.’ I am using this phrase of ‘together understanding’ to describe that feeling of when you are sharing with someone a personal experience, and they respond in a validating way, not only giving you reassurance, but also perhaps sharing a unique perspective that might further develop your understanding, there is then this experience of

    Ah what a relief, and wow, I never thought that – hence ‘together understanding.’

     it’s not that deep acts as a band aid for emotional experience, covering up what might be going on underneath. So instead of experiencing, we avoid. This is emotional immaturity.

    On a macro-level, we are moving away from ‘experiencing’ and ‘embodying’ and towards just ‘explaining.’  With tons of new information to consume, we can easily have big concepts reduced to sound bites. Depth transformed to simplistic solutions. As the masses consume simplified versions of depth, we can easily ‘explain’ our experiences away. Explanation is not embodiment; it is just another defence structure to avoid. In psychology we call this intellectualisation, and we are all guilty of it! As a whole society, I believe we are emotionally immature.

    In current affairs, there is no denying how completely disconnected we have truly become as a society. I am speaking to the west specifically.

    A society built on superficial connections – may further business, economy, and production, but it won’t foster or encourage emotional connection. In a capitalistic society we have been told that:

    Work hard, make money = be more successful and therefore = more happiness, just keep climbing the ladder and you will eventually get there!

    This is clearly, a lie. We have been told this to keep us working, and then being so busy and tired, we start consuming. It’s a cycle, to keep us trapped, and hinders flexibility, and further thinking and questioning. Through curiosity we create new solutions. Unfortunately, society is not very curious. Returning to the original point of this piece: ‘it’s not that deep’ continues to disconnect.  

    What does this disconnection look like? Well let’s look at the divided society for example, the right vs. the left. Without understanding, thinking, and feeling, we can’t then experience empathy for others. Empathy is an important ingredient to cultivate peaceful and harmonious societies. To come together as a collective and care for humanity. The further secular and individualistic we become as a society – the less attuned we are to ourselves/our bodies/our souls.

    If a society is emotionally immature, it will really help capitalism thrive: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, people continue to be disconnected, chaos ensues, vulnerability to dogma/propaganda/brainwash, so on so forth – think fascism.

    Its not that deep is just another barrier to further accessing one’s inner world and remaining on the surface. When we avoid parts of ourselves, we will inevitably avoid those parts in others. All of which translates to producing surface level connections.

    There is a world of information inside each and every one of us, if we explore it and allow ourselves to experience the discomfort that will inevitably arise, the better equipped we are to connect meaningfully to others. I believe that self-understanding leads to collective understanding, which can perhaps create a more compassionate society. (A girl can dream).

    Meaningful connection is the antidote. Difference will always exist, but what if we were kinder? What if we were more understanding of different people? Disconnection doesn’t allow for things like empathy, kindness, or compassion to evolve and grow.

    Creating lasting change begins with small, local efforts – having that spillover into larger spaces. So where can you begin to implement change and space for curiosity in your relationships today?

  • Walking towards true love

    disclaimer: thoughts and ideas are not fixed and are allowed to evolve and develop

    Love, I believe is an infinite resource. In a world where, everything, like lifespan of the human body, is finite. Nothing is forever but what if, love is?

    I was in love once.

    At the time, I was completely consumed by the depths of my feelings for my partner, to a point of self-sacrificing behaviours, i.e. neglecting my own needs. And in this period of my life, I was unaware I had any needs. So I associated this all-consuming feeling to be that of ‘true love.’ Now, a few years later, I can see that this all consuming feeling was not the love, it was the attachment. This is not to say that there was no love, but besides love was an unhealthy attachment. Now that the attachment has faded, I am left with only love.

    First came grief, as it does, hi again old friend, here you are to remind me that I once loved and do still love. When the grief passes, it is then transformed back into its original form, but deepened: love. A love that lingers, a love for who that person was in my life at the time, and who he continues to be and become. The only difference is that we are no longer in a relationship. This project really began after my relationship ended, but I was too close to the subject matter to truly get started. With time came further query, and greater understanding.

    Why did the relationship end you might ask, if there was love? Well, relationships require a few key ingredients to sustain themselves, and sometimes, if the only ingredient is love, and none of the other important stuff – it will be hard to endure. I was younger then, my ex and I were both on journeys of self-discovery, and this actually lead to the realization that the dynamic we created together was not a healthy one. At the time it felt like I was hitting my head against a wall, doing absolutely everything to find a solution, how can we move past this?  What can we do to make this work? It was no longer a relationship that worked, and we had run out of resources to continue, I knew that if I stayed the toxic pattern will persist, so there was only one option, and it was to walk away. Going deeper, this was a painful pattern repeating through generations, and I can now look back to see I am breaking a cycle much bigger than me. (more on this in future posts)

    At the time it might not have felt like it, but now I know walking away really was walking towards, true love.

    Shall we get analytical?

    Let’s begin with the word, relationship. It comes from the word, relate

    Relationship is to relate, to another human.

    There is no such thing as the perfect/right person for you – there is only the spectrum of love and relationships. Healthy, unhealthy and all that which ebbs and flows in between.

    I read and think a lot about love,

    What I am learning is that when two (or more) individuals come together there is something being created, and this some ‘thing’ is a relationship, that is building on the foundation of love. To love is to not only be in love, but also to act and therefore do from love.

    Love is a process, a collaboration between two (or more) souls.

    A process that is always occurring, therefore a constant.

    A relationship requires work, and ideally it is work you want to be doing, because it comes from a place of love.

    So, to love, is to be faced with your flaws (we all have them!) and to decide what path you will take, will you choose a familiar one or the path of discomfort? As commonly said, growth only occurs in times of discomfort. So will you take the leap of faith to commit to a new path: the one towards true love.

    -true love

    To observe, confront, overcome new challenges, gain new insights, and ultimately expand, from the heart.

    Now, let’s imagine a world where we operated on the principle of true love.